Still mate, none of them are solid evidence to prove your points. The woman beating part i think we all know, the grooming teenager one, its legal though, isnt it? The grifting or whatever that word is, there has been multiple people infact alot that say that HU has helped them financially and in different ways aswell, though i would say that 50 dollars might be overpriced. Either way hes not scamming them, if youre not willing to put the effort and the discipline, dont go on ranting how HU didnt help you grow cause you magically thought you were gonna get richer as soon as you paid your 50 dollars. HU is a guide, it tells you what to do, if you are lazy to do it or undisciplined then, thats a different story. About the exhibit 3 one, firstly, its not his business, its an entitely hypothetical story, also, he probably exaggerated his thoughts on that one just to play around a little bit, but i understand that he meant what he said. He is in part not correct about the 8k and 10k thing, but you cannot say hes wrong either. You have a girlfriend she says she wants to do of, you say no, she says she wants to do it anyway, you say okay but give me a percentage of your profit. Now. Imagine every man and their dad sees your gf’s private parts, and accessable to the internet very easy, and that once you put something on the internet, it stays there forever no matter how much you want to delete it, and you think im just gonna let her keep all the profit when i told her that i do not want her to do that shit? Ofcourse, 8k from 10k is exaggerated but atleast like 1k. Right. But you might say, well its her own life, alright, i agree, but in that sense, break up with your boyfriend then. Every womans body has its own value, why go ahead and expose it online and strip it of its value? When there is no value in a woman, why do you expect the boyfriend to stay with you? As for the one where he states that rape victims have to bear atleast some responsibility, he is entirely correct. Ofcourse he also said that he isnt defending the rapists and that they should be punished severely in that sense even having their d*cks chopped off, but he also said that if you go around naked in the streets and not expect anything to happen to you, youre not correct. Same thing like if i go to a highly dangerous neighbourhood where crime rates are known to be high, at 2 am on, holding 10k worth of money on top of my head,and expect to not bear atleast some responsibility for it, youre wrong. He wasnt saying that it is the case everytime, cause if youre a kid of the age of 12 you cant bear responsibility since you are just a kid. But if youre over the age of 18 you are responsible for your own actions and ofcourse rapists shouldnt rape but protect yourself at all costs in that matter as well. As for exhibition 5 he was saying those things cause the mans life is at such risk of being absolutely destroyed just for one rape allegation which can not even have solid evidence and be believed to be true. Heres a case which occured in america, a group of highschool girls accused a guy of raping them, the guy was expelled, restricted heavily up in to the point where he was house arrested for the entire summer, while he couldnt even have the face to speak to anyone cause of the allegations. And, just for the girls later to come up and say that he didnt rape them they just accused him cause they didnt like him. Imagine that, my friend. And that is why Andrew said that. The guys life couldve been absolutely destroyed and he couldve even taken his own life, if it wasnt for them to come up on their own.