The wom*n is immunized against all dangers: one may call her a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off her like water off a raincoat. But call her a woman and you will be astonished at how she recoils, how injured she is, how she suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out!”

One cannot defend himself against the wom*n. She attacks with lightning speed from her position of safety and uses her abilities to crush any attempt at defense.

Quickly she turns the attacker’s charges back on him and the attacker becomes the liar, the troublemaker, the terrorist. Nothing could be more mistaken than to defend oneself. That is just what the wom*n wants. She can invent a new lie every day for the enemy to respond to, and the result is that the enemy spends so much time defending himself that he has no time to do what the wom*n really fears: to attack. The accused has become the accuser, and loudly she shoves the accuser into the dock. So it always was in the past when a person or a movement fought the wom*n. That is what would happen to us as well were we not fully aware of her nature, and if we lacked the courage to draw the following radical conclusions:

1. One cannot fight the wom*n by positive means. He is a negative, and this negative must be erased from the American system or she will forever corrupt it.
2. One cannot discuss the fem*le question with the wom*n. One can hardly prove to a person that one has the duty to render her harmless.
3. One cannot allow the wom*n the same means one would give an honest opponent, for she is no honorable opponent. she will use generosity and nobility only to trap her enemy.
4. The wom*n has nothing to say about male questions. She is a foreigner, an alien, who only enjoys the rights of a guest, rights that she always abuses.
5. The so-called gender morality of the wom*n is no morality at all, rather an encouragement to betrayal. Therefore, they have no claim to protection from the state.
6. The wom*n is not smarter than we are, rather only cleverer and craftier. Her system cannot be defeated economically — she follows entirely different moral principles than we do. It can only be broken through political means.
7. A wom*n cannot insult a man. Fem*le slanders are but badges of honor for a male opponent of the wom*n.
8. The more a man or a male movement opposes the wom*n, the more valuable it is. If someone is attacked by the wom*n, that is a sure sign of his virtue. He who is not persecuted by the wom*n, or who is praised by them, is useless and dangerous.
9. The wom*n evaluates male questions from the fem*le standpoint. As a result, the opposite of what he says must be true.
10. One must either affirm or reject mysogony. He who defends the fem*le harms his own people. One can only be a fem*le lackey or a fem*le opponent. Opposing the wom*n is a matter of personal hygiene.
These principles give the anti-wom*n movement a chance of success. Only such a movement will be taken seriously by the fem*les, only such a movement will be feared by them.

The fact that she shouts and complains about such a movement therefore is only a sign that it is right. We are therefore delighted that we are constantly attacked in the fem*le gazettes. They may shout about terror. We answer with Mussolini’s familiar words: “Terror? Never! It is social hygiene. We take these individuals out of circulation just as a doctor does to a bacterium.”