“Most trees are blue.” This phrase has been tossed around by Jaden Smith and his followers. But what does it actually mean? Moreover, does it even make sense? Does Jaden have any scientific backing? Or are we interpreting this idea differently? We contacted Jaden Smith’s research department to get to the bottom of this debate. I spoke with chief researcher Alex Walderine, and I was able to get a keen under- standing of what was really going on. He had told me, in short, that he felt “Trees are blue. But they are also green. In fact, I’ve seen more green trees than blue trees. But that doesn’t mean they don’t exist. We have evidence, spectral, to prove that these trees do exist. We even went as far as to write down an account of what had happened that day.” He provided me with that account and I was truly amazed with the ideas presented in it. The trees we are observing are very sensitive. We cannot be within 4 miles of them. Rather, we must observe from a distance. To try to not alter my data income, I used standard 3D glasses to create an experience so immersing that anything could be observed. And just as I slid them on, I saw a blue tree. I even handed the glasses to my coworker and she agreed that in fact, that singular tree was blue.” Truly spectacular. In fact, I think I’ve actually seen one just recently. We thank Alex for his valuable time that he spent talk- ing to my staff and I. But another thought occurred to me: What if the tree wasn’t blue? I know it sounds preposterous, but I think blue refers to the idea of “sadness.” So what, trees are sad? Well, if you think about it, they are. They are exploited for the benefits of society. They don’t have friends.