Here’s the thing. You said a “dildo is a vibrator.”

Is it in the same family? Yes. No one’s arguing that.

As someone who is a scientist who studies vibrators, I am telling you, specifically, in science, no one calls dildos vibrators. If you want to be “specific” like you said, then you shouldn’t either. They’re not the same thing.

If you’re saying “vibrator family” you’re referring to the taxonomic grouping of Seximus Toyidus, which includes things from nutcrackers to bjays to anal.

So your reasoning for calling a dildo a vibrator is because random people “call the black ones vibrators?” Let’s get anal beads and silicon pussies in there, then, too.

Also, calling someone a human or an ape? It’s not one or the other, that’s not how taxonomy works. They’re both. A dildo is a dildo and a member of the vibrator family. But that’s not what you said. You said a dildo is a vibrator, which is not true unless you’re okay with calling all members of the vibrator family vibrators, which means you’d call anal beads, silicon pusses, and sex toys vibrators, too. Which you said you don’t.

It’s okay to just admit you’re wrong, you know?